4.6 Article

Next-generation dynamic global vegetation models: learning from community ecology

Journal

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
Volume 198, Issue 3, Pages 957-969

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.12210

Keywords

aDGVM2; coexistence; community assembly; DGVM; dynamic vegetation model; trait based model

Categories

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)
  2. Landesoffensive zur Entwicklung wissenschaftlich-okonomischer Exzellenz (LOEWE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs) are powerful tools to project past, current and future vegetation patterns and associated biogeochemical cycles. However, most models are limited by how they define vegetation and by their simplistic representation of competition. We discuss how concepts from community assembly theory and coexistence theory can help to improve vegetation models. We further present a trait- and individual-based vegetation model (aDGVM2) that allows individual plants to adopt a unique combination of trait values. These traits define how individual plants grow and compete. A genetic optimization algorithm is used to simulate trait inheritance and reproductive isolation between individuals. These model properties allow the assembly of plant communities that are adapted to a site's biotic and abiotic conditions. The aDGVM2 simulates how environmental conditions influence the trait spectra of plant communities; that fire selects for traits that enhance fire protection and reduces trait diversity; and the emergence of life-history strategies that are suggestive of colonizationcompetition trade-offs. The aDGVM2 deals with functional diversity and competition fundamentally differently from current DGVMs. This approach may yield novel insights as to how vegetation may respond to climate change and we believe it could foster collaborations between functional plant biologists and vegetation modellers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available