4.6 Article

The response of the maize nitrate transport system to nitrogen demand and supply across the lifecycle

Journal

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
Volume 198, Issue 1, Pages 82-94

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.12166

Keywords

maize; nitrate; nitrogen; nitrogen use efficiency (NUE); uptake

Categories

Funding

  1. Australian Centre for Plant Functional Genomics, DuPont Pioneer, Australian Research Council Linkage Grant [LP0776635]
  2. Australian Research Council [LP0776635] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An understanding of nitrate (NO3 ) uptake throughout the lifecycle of plants, and how this process responds to nitrogen (N) availability, is an important step towards the development of plants with improved nitrogen use efficiency (NUE). NO3 uptake capacity and transcript levels of putative high- and low-affinity NO3 transporters (NRTs) were profiled across the lifecycle of dwarf maize (Zea mays) plants grown at reduced and adequate NO3 . Plants showed major changes in high-affinity NO3 uptake capacity across the lifecycle, which varied with changing relative growth rates of roots and shoots. Transcript abundances of putative high-affinity NRTs (predominantly ZmNRT2.1 and ZmNRT2.2) were correlated with two distinct peaks in high-affinity root NO3 uptake capacity and also N availability. The reduction in NO3 supply during the lifecycle led to a dramatic increase in NO3 uptake capacity, which preceded changes in transcript levels of NRTs, suggesting a model with short-term post-translational regulation and longer term transcriptional regulation of NO3 uptake capacity. These observations offer new insight into the control of NO3 uptake by both plant developmental processes and N availability, and identify key control points that may be targeted by future plant improvement programmes to enhance N uptake relative to availability and/or demand.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available