4.6 Article

Woody clockworks: circadian regulation of night-time water use in Eucalyptus globulus

Journal

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
Volume 200, Issue 3, Pages 743-752

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.12382

Keywords

cells-to-ecosystem; circadian clock; night-time stomatal conductance; sap flux; scaling; water balance

Categories

Funding

  1. Australian Government Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry under Forest Industries Climate Change Research Fund program
  2. Ramon y Cajal program (Spanish government) [RYC-2008-02050]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The role of the circadian clock in controlling the metabolism of entire trees has seldom been considered. We tested whether the clock influences nocturnal whole-tree water use. Whole-tree chambers allowed the control of environmental variables (temperature, relative humidity). Night-time stomatal conductance (g(s)) and sap flow (Q) were monitored in 6- to 8-m-tall Eucalyptus globulus trees during nights when environmental variables were kept constant, and also when conditions varied with time. Artificial neural networks were used to quantify the relative importance of circadian regulation of g(s) and Q. Under a constant environment, g(s) and Q declined from 0 to 6h after dusk, but increased from 6 to 12h after dusk. While the initial decline could be attributed to multiple processes, the subsequent increase is most consistent with circadian regulation of g(s) and Q. We conclude that endogenous regulation of g(s) is an important driver of night-time Q under natural environmental variability. The proportion of nocturnal Q variation associated with circadian regulation (23-56%) was comparable to that attributed to vapor pressure deficit variation (25-58%). This study contributes to our understanding of the linkages between molecular and cellular processes related to circadian regulation, and whole-tree processes related to ecosystem gas exchange in the field.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available