4.6 Article

Drought predisposes pinon-juniper woodlands to insect attacks and mortality

Journal

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
Volume 198, Issue 2, Pages 567-578

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.12174

Keywords

climate change; drought; host defense; insect resistance; juniper; pinon; resin

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute of Climatic Change Research (NICCR)
  2. Department of Energy (DOE)
  3. Drought Impacts on Regional Ecosystems Network (DIREnet via NSF)
  4. Office of Science (BER), US DOE
  5. Division Of Environmental Biology
  6. Direct For Biological Sciences [1232294] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To test the hypothesis that drought predisposes trees to insect attacks, we quantified the effects of water availability on insect attacks, tree resistance mechanisms, and mortality of mature pinon pine (Pinus edulis) and one-seed juniper (Juniperus monosperma) using an experimental drought study in New Mexico, USA. The study had four replicated treatments (40x40m plot/replicate): removal of 45% of ambient annual precipitation (H2O); irrigation to produce 125% of ambient annual precipitation (H2O+); a drought control (C) to quantify the impact of the drought infrastructure; and ambient precipitation (A). Pinon began dying 1yr after drought initiation, with higher mortality in the H2O treatment relative to other treatments. Beetles (bark/twig) were present in 92% of dead trees. Resin duct density and area were more strongly affected by treatments and more strongly associated with pinon mortality than direct measurements of resin flow. For juniper, treatments had no effect on insect resistance or attacks, but needle browning was highest in the H2O treatment. Our results provide strong evidence that 1 yr of severe drought predisposes pinon to insect attacks and increases mortality, whereas 3yr of the same drought causes partial canopy loss in juniper.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available