Journal
NEW PHYTOLOGIST
Volume 201, Issue 1, Pages 217-229Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.12487
Keywords
branching symmetry; Euler buckling; hydraulic architecture; light interception; metabolic scaling theory; plant allometry; West Brown and Enquist
Categories
Funding
- NSF [IBN-0743148]
- ATB Award [0742800]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The West, Brown, Enquist (WBE) model derives symmetrically self-similar branching to predict metabolic scaling from hydraulic conductance, K, (a metabolism proxy) and tree mass (or volume, V). The original prediction was KV0.75. We ask whether trees differ from WBE symmetry and if it matters for plant function and scaling. We measure tree branching and model how architecture influences K, V, mechanical stability, light interception and metabolic scaling. We quantified branching architecture by measuring the path fraction, P-f: mean/maximum trunk-to-twig pathlength. WBE symmetry produces the maximum, P-f=1.0. We explored tree morphospace using a probability-based numerical model constrained only by biomechanical principles. Real tree P-f ranged from 0.930 (nearly symmetric) to 0.357 (very asymmetric). At each modeled tree size, a reduction in P-f led to: increased K; decreased V; increased mechanical stability; and decreased light absorption. When P-f was ontogenetically constant, strong asymmetry only slightly steepened metabolic scaling. The P-f ontogeny of real trees, however, was U' shaped, resulting in size-dependent metabolic scaling that exceeded 0.75 in small trees before falling below 0.65. Architectural diversity appears to matter considerably for whole-tree hydraulics, mechanics, photosynthesis and potentially metabolic scaling. Optimal architectures likely exist that maximize carbon gain per structural investment.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available