4.6 Article

Comparative physiological responses of Solanum nigrum and Solanum torvum to cadmium stress

Journal

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
Volume 196, Issue 1, Pages 125-138

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04236.x

Keywords

accumulation; amino acid; cadmium (Cd); organic acid; Solanum nigrum; Solanum torvum; tolerance

Categories

Funding

  1. China National Natural Sciences Foundation [31170228]
  2. Knowledge Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [KSCX2-EW-Q-25]
  3. National Major Special Project on New Varieties Cultivation for Transgenic Organisms [2009ZX08009-130B]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Under cadmium (Cd) stress, Solanum nigrum accumulated threefold more Cd in its leaves and was tolerant to Cd, whereas its low Cd-accumulating relative, Solanum torvum, suffered reduced growth and marked oxidative damage. However, the physiological mechanisms that are responsible for differential Cd accumulation and tolerance between the two Solanum species are largely unknown. Here, the involvement of antioxidative capacity and the accumulation of organic and amino acids in response to Cd stress in the two Solanum species were assessed. Solanum nigrum contains higher antioxidative capacity than does S. torvum under Cd toxicity. Metabolomics analysis indicated that Cd treatment also markedly increased the production of several organic and amino acids in S. nigrum. Pretreatment with proline and histidine increased Cd accumulation; moreover, pretreatment with citric acid increased Cd accumulation in leaves but decreased Cd accumulation in roots, which indicates that its biosynthesis could be linked to Cd long-distance transport and accumulation in leaves. Our data provide novel metabolite evidence regarding the enhancement of citric acid and amino acid biosynthesis in Cd-treated S. nigrum, support the role of these metabolites in improving Cd tolerance and accumulation, and may help to provide a better understanding of stress adaptation in other Solanum species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available