4.6 Review

Widespread fitness alignment in the legume-rhizobium symbiosis

Journal

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
Volume 194, Issue 4, Pages 1096-1111

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04099.x

Keywords

conflict; legume-rhizobium; meta-analysis; mutualism; pleiotropy; symbiosis

Categories

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. Center for Population Biology at the University of California, Davis, CA, USA
  3. Direct For Biological Sciences
  4. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems [0820846] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although cheaters potentially destabilize the legumerhizobium mutualism, we lack a comprehensive review of hostsymbiont fitness correlations. Studies measuring rhizobium relative or absolute fitness and host benefit are surveyed. Mutant studies are tallied for evidence of pleiotropy; studies of natural strains are analyzed with meta-analysis. Of 80 rhizobium mutations, 19 decrease both partners fitness, four increase both, two increase host fitness but decrease symbiont fitness and none increase symbiont fitness at the hosts expense. The pooled correlation between rhizobium nodulation competitiveness and plant aboveground biomass is 0.65 across five experiments that compete natural strains against a reference, whereas, across 14 experiments that compete rhizobia against soil populations or each other, the pooled correlation is 0.24. Pooled correlations between aboveground biomass and nodule number and nodule biomass are 0.76 and 0.83. Positive correlations between legume and rhizobium fitness imply that most ineffective rhizobia are defective rather than defectors; this extends to natural variants, with only one significant fitness conflict. Most studies involve non-coevolved associations, indicating that fitness alignment is the default state. Rhizobium mutations that increase both host and symbiont fitness suggest that some plants maladaptively restrict symbiosis with novel strains.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available