4.6 Article

Effects of stomatal delays on the economics of leaf gas exchange under intermittent light regimes

Journal

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
Volume 192, Issue 3, Pages 640-652

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03847.x

Keywords

intermittent light; leaf economics; photosynthesis; stomatal conductance; sunfleck

Categories

Funding

  1. US Department of Energy through the Office of Biological and Environmental Research (BER) [NICCR DE-FC02-06ER64156]
  2. US National Science Foundation [NSF-CBET-1033467, NSF-EAR-10-13339]
  3. US Department of Agriculture [2011-67003-30222]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Understory plants are subjected to highly intermittent light availability and their leaf gas exchanges are mediated by delayed responses of stomata and leaf biochemistry to light fluctuations. In this article, the patterns in stomatal delays across biomes and plant functional types were studied and their effects on leaf carbon gains and water losses were quantified. A database of more than 60 published datasets on stomatal responses to light fluctuations was assembled. To interpret these experimental observations, a leaf gas exchange model was developed and coupled to a novel formulation of stomatal movement energetics. The model was used to test whether stomatal delays optimize light capture for photosynthesis, whilst limiting transpiration and carbon costs for stomatal movement. The data analysis showed that stomatal opening and closing delays occurred over a limited range of values and were strongly correlated. Plant functional type and climate were the most important drivers of stomatal delays, with faster responses in graminoids and species from dry climates. Although perfectly tracking stomata would maximize photosynthesis and minimize transpiration at the expense of large opening costs, the observed combinations of opening and closure times appeared to be consistent with a near-optimal balance of carbon gain, water loss and movement costs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available