4.6 Article

Type-2 histone deacetylases as new regulators of elicitor-induced cell death in plants

Journal

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
Volume 192, Issue 1, Pages 127-139

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03788.x

Keywords

cell death; cryptogein; histone deacetylase; hypersensitive response (HR); Nicotiana tabacum; nuclear signalling; plant defence

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministere de l'Education Nationale, de la Recherche et de la Technologie
  2. Conseil Regional de Bourgogne
  3. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale
  4. Genopole ToulouseMidi-Pyrenees
  5. Region Midi-Pyrenees
  6. ANR 'Grant ANR-Plates-Formes Technologiques du Vivant (PFTV)
  7. Ministere de l'Enseignement Superieur et de la Recherche
  8. Universite de Bourgogne

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Plant resistance to pathogen attack is often associated with a localized programmed cell death called hypersensitive response (HR). How this cell death is controlled remains largely unknown. Upon treatment with cryptogein, an elicitor of tobacco defence and cell death, we identified NtHD2a and NtHD2b, two redundant isoforms of type-2 nuclear histone deacetylases (HDACs). These HDACs are phosphorylated after a few minutes' treatment, and their rate of mRNAs are rapidly and strongly reduced, leading to a 40-fold decrease after10 h of treatment. By using HDAC inhibitors, RNAi- and overexpression-based approaches, we showed that HDACs, and especially NtHD2a /b, act as inhibitors of cryptogein-induced cell death. Moreover, in NtHD2a/b-silenced plants, infiltration with cryptogein led to HR-like symptoms in distal leaves. Taken together, these results show for the first time that type-2 HDACs, which are specific to plants, act as negative regulators of elicitor-induced cell death in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum), suggesting that the HR is controlled by post-translational modifications including (de) acetylation of nuclear proteins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available