4.6 Article

Testing hypotheses that link wood anatomy to cavitation resistance and hydraulic conductivity in the genus Acer

Journal

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
Volume 190, Issue 3, Pages 709-723

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03518.x

Keywords

Acer; cavitation resistance; hydraulic conductivity; pit structure; rare pit hypothesis; vessel distribution; vessel wall thickenings; wood density

Categories

Funding

  1. Fund for Scientific Research-Flanders (Belgium) [G.0268.04, KaN 1.5.035.10]
  2. K.U. Leuven [OT/05/35]
  3. Ministry of Science, Research, and the Arts (Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)
  4. F.W.O. - Vlaanderen
  5. [NSF-IBN-0743148]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

P>Vulnerability to cavitation and conductive efficiency depend on xylem anatomy. We tested a large range of structure-function hypotheses, some for the first time, within a single genus to minimize phylogenetic 'noise' and maximize detection of functionally relevant variation. This integrative study combined in-depth anatomical observations using light, scanning and transmission electron microscopy of seven Acer taxa, and compared these observations with empirical measures of xylem hydraulics. Our results reveal a 2 MPa range in species' mean cavitation pressure (MCP). MCP was strongly correlated with intervessel pit structure (membrane thickness and porosity, chamber depth), weakly correlated with pit number per vessel, and not related to pit area per vessel. At the tissue level, there was a strong correlation between MCP and mechanical strength parameters, and some of the first evidence is provided for the functional significance of vessel grouping and thickenings on inner vessel walls. In addition, a strong trade-off was observed between xylem-specific conductivity and MCP. Vessel length and intervessel wall characteristics were implicated in this safety-efficiency trade-off. Cavitation resistance and hydraulic conductivity in Acer appear to be controlled by a very complex interaction between tissue, vessel network and pit characteristics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available