4.6 Article

Genome-wide gene expression changes in genetically stable synthetic and natural wheat allohexaploids

Journal

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
Volume 187, Issue 4, Pages 1181-1194

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03339.x

Keywords

additive and nonadditive; gene expression regulation; microarray; transgenerational stability; wheat

Categories

Funding

  1. ANR (Agence Nationale pour la Recherche) [ANR-05-BDIV-015]
  2. French Research Ministry (MENRT)
  3. Evry-Genopole postdoctoral fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

P>The present study aims to understand regulation of gene expression in synthetic and natural wheat (Triticum aestivum) allohexaploids, that combines the AB genome of Triticum turgidum and the D genome of Aegilops tauschii; and which we have recently characterized as genetically stable. We conducted a comprehensive genome-wide analysis of gene expression that allowed characterization of the effect of variability of the D genome progenitor, the intergenerational stability as well as the comparison with natural wheat allohexaploid. We used the Affymetrix GeneChip Wheat Genome Array, on which 55 049 transcripts are represented. Additive expression was shown to represent the majority of expression regulation in the synthetic allohexaploids, where expression for more than c. 93% of transcripts was equal to the mid-parent value measured from a mixture of parental RNA. This leaves c. 2000 (c. 7%) transcripts, in which expression was nonadditive. No global gene expression bias or dominance towards any of the progenitor genomes was observed whereas high intergenerational stability and low effect of the D genome progenitor variability were revealed. Our study suggests that gene expression regulation in wheat allohexaploids is established early upon allohexaploidization and highly conserved over generations, as demonstrated by the high similarity of expression with natural wheat allohexaploids.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available