4.6 Article

Is heterosis in maize mediated through better water use?

Journal

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
Volume 187, Issue 2, Pages 392-406

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03276.x

Keywords

Delta 13C; Delta 18O; drought; grain yield; heterosis; maize (Zea mays); water use

Categories

Funding

  1. DTMA (Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation)
  2. BMZ, Germany [08.7860.3-001.00]
  3. Spanish MEC [AP2005-4965]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

P>Heterosis increases yield potential and improves adaptation to stress in maize (Zea mays); however, the underlying mechanisms remain elusive. A set of tropical inbred lines and their hybrids were grown in the field for 2 yr under three different water regimes. First-year plant water use was evaluated by measuring instantaneous traits (stomatal conductance (g(s)) and steady-state chlorophyll fluorescence (F(s))) in individual leaves together with time-integrative traits, which included mineral accumulation in the whole leaves of plants and oxygen isotope enrichment above source water (Delta 18O) and carbon isotope discrimination (Delta 13C) in the same pooled leaves and in mature kernels. Second-year water use was evaluated by measuring leaf temperature, g(s) and relative water content (RWC). Within each growing condition, hybrids showed higher F(s), mineral accumulation, RWC, and lower leaf temperature, Delta 18O and Delta 13C than inbred lines. Therefore, hybrids had a better water status than inbred lines, regardless of the water conditions. Differences in grain yield across growing conditions were explained by differences in water-use traits, with hybrids and inbred lines following a common pattern. Within each growing condition, most variations in grain yield, between hybrids and inbred lines, were also explained by differences in plant water-use traits. Heterosis in tropical maize seems to be mediated by improved water use, irrespective of the water conditions during growth.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available