4.6 Article

Durability of plant major resistance genes to pathogens depends on the genetic background, experimental evidence and consequences for breeding strategies

Journal

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
Volume 183, Issue 1, Pages 190-199

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02827.x

Keywords

mutation; pepper; polygenic resistance; potato virus Y; resistance breakdown; resistance durability; selection; virulence

Categories

Funding

  1. ComitE Technique Permanent de la SElection (CTPS, Ministry of agriculture)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The breakdown of plant resistance by pathogen populations is a limit to the genetic control of crop disease. Polygenic resistance is postulated as a durable alternative to defeated major resistance genes. Here, we tested this postulate in the pepper-Potato virus Y interaction. The virus was selected for virulence towards monogenic and polygenic host resistance, using serial inoculations in laboratory and in natural epidemic conditions. The frequency of resistance breakdown and the genetic changes in the virus avirulence gene were analysed. The monogenic resistance provided by the pvr2(3) gene was defeated at high frequency when introgressed in a susceptible genetic background whereas it was not when combined to partial resistance quantitative trait loci. The suppression of emergence of virulent mutants because of the genetic background resulted both from a differential selection effect and the necessity for the virus to generate multiple mutations. The virus adaptation to the polygenic resistance required a step-by-step selection with a primary selection for virulence towards the major gene, followed by selection for adaptation to the genetic background. Polygenic resistance proved more durable than monogenic resistance, but breeding strategies giving priority to major resistance factors may jeopardize the progress in durability expected from polygenic resistance. New Phytologist (2009) 183: 190-199doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02827.x.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available