4.6 Article

Architecture of the wood-wide web: Rhizopogon spp. genets link multiple Douglas-fir cohorts

Journal

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
Volume 185, Issue 2, Pages 543-553

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03069.x

Keywords

ectomycorrhizas; forest stability; fungal genet; microsatellites; mycorrhizal network; Pseudotsuga menziesii (Douglas-fir); Rhizopogon; stand dynamics

Categories

Funding

  1. Province of British Columbia
  2. University of British Columbia
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

P>The role of mycorrhizal networks in forest dynamics is poorly understood because of the elusiveness of their spatial structure. We mapped the belowground distribution of the fungi Rhizopogon vesiculosus and Rhizopogon vinicolor and interior Douglas-fir trees (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. glauca) to determine the architecture of a mycorrhizal network in a multi-aged old-growth forest. Rhizopogon spp. mycorrhizas were collected within a 30 x 30 m plot. Trees and fungal genets were identified using multi-locus microsatellite DNA analysis. Tree genotypes from mycorrhizas were matched to reference trees aboveground. Two trees were considered linked if they shared the same fungal genet(s). The two Rhizopogon species each formed 13-14 genets, each colonizing up to 19 trees in the plot. Rhizopogon vesiculosus genets were larger, occurred at greater depths, and linked more trees than genets of R. vinicolor. Multiple tree cohorts were linked, with young saplings established within the mycorrhizal network of Douglas-fir veterans. A strong positive relationship was found between tree size and connectivity, resulting in a scale-free network architecture with small-world properties. This mycorrhizal network architecture suggests an efficient and robust network, where large trees play a foundational role in facilitating conspecific regeneration and stabilizing the ecosystem.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available