4.6 Article

Novel Phr1 mutations and the evolution of phenol reaction variation in US weedy rice (Oryza sativa)

Journal

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
Volume 184, Issue 4, Pages 842-850

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02957.x

Keywords

crop-weed hybridization; phenol reaction; Phr1; polyphenol oxidase; red rice (Oryza sativa); weedy crop relatives; weed evolution

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DBI-0638820]
  2. National Institutes of Health [1F32GM082165]
  3. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [F32GM082165] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

P>Red rice, a major agricultural weed, is phenotypically diverse and possesses traits that are similar to both wild and cultivated rice. The genetic resources available for rice make it possible to examine the molecular basis and evolution of traits characterizing this weed. Here, we assess the phenol reaction - a classical trait for distinguishing among cultivated rice varieties - in red rice at the phenotypic and molecular levels. We phenotyped more than 100 US weed samples for the phenol reaction and sequenced the underlying Phr1 locus in a subset of samples. Data were analyzed in combination with previously published Phr1 data for cultivated rice. Most weed accessions (96.3%) are positive for the phenol reaction, and samples with a negative response carry loss-of-function alleles that are rare or heretofore undocumented. One such allele may have evolved through mutational convergence of a 1-bp frameshift insertion. Haplotype sharing between red rice and US cultivars suggests occasional crop-weed hybridization. Our discovery of previously undocumented nonfunctional phr1 alleles suggests that there are likely to be other loss-of-function mutations segregating in Oryza sativa around the world. Red rice may provide a useful study system for understanding the adaptive significance of Phr1 variation in agricultural settings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available