4.6 Article

Giving and receiving:: measuring the carbon cost of mycorrhizas in the green orchid, Goodyera repens

Journal

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
Volume 180, Issue 1, Pages 176-184

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02533.x

Keywords

C-14; autotrophy; carbon budget; myco-heterotrophy; net carbon fluxes; orchid; radio-isotope

Categories

Funding

  1. Leverhulme trust [F/000118/AD]
  2. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/EO14070/1]
  3. NERC [NE/E014070/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/E014070/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Direct measurement of the carbon (C) 'cost' of mycorrhizas is problematic. Although estimates have been made for arbuscular and ectomycorrhizal symbioses, these are based on incomplete budgets or indirect measurements. Furthermore, the conventional model of unidirectional plant-to-fungus C flux is too simplistic. Net fungus-to-plant C transfer supports seedling establishment in c. 10% of plant species, including most orchids, and bidirectional C flows occur in ectomycorrhiza utilizing soil amino acids. Here, the C cost of mycorrhizas to the green orchid Goodyera repens was determined by measurement of simultaneous bidirectional fluxes of C-14 labelled sources using a monoxenic system with the fungus Ceratobasidium cornigerum. Transfer of C from fungus to plant ('up-flow') occurs in the photosynthesizing orchid G. repens (max. 0.06 mu g) whereas over five times more current assimilate (min. 0.355 mu g) is simultaneously allocated in the reverse direction to the mycorrhizal fungus ('clown-flow') after 8 d. Carbon is transferred rapidly, being detected in plant-fungal respiration within 31 h of labelling. This study provides the most complete C budget for an orchid-mycorrhizal symbiosis, and clearly shows net plant-to-fungus C flux. The rapidity of bidirectional C flux is indicative of dynamic transfer at an interfacial apoplast as opposed to reliance on digestion of fungal pelotons.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available