4.6 Article

Random walk centrality for temporal networks

Journal

NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS
Volume 16, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/16/6/063023

Keywords

random walks; temporal networks; TempoRank; network centrality; stationary state; network analysis

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council (VR)
  2. MEXT, Japan [23681033]
  3. Nakajima Foundation
  4. JSPS
  5. FRS-FNRS under the Japan-Belgium Research Cooperative Program
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23681033] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nodes can be ranked according to their relative importance within a network. Ranking algorithms based on random walks are particularly useful because they connect topological and diffusive properties of the network. Previous methods based on random walks, for example the PageRank, have focused on static structures. However, several realistic networks are indeed dynamic, meaning that their structure changes in time. In this paper, we propose a centrality measure for temporal networks based on random walks under periodic boundary conditions that we call TempoRank. It is known that, in static networks, the stationary density of the random walk is proportional to the degree or the strength of a node. In contrast, we find that, in temporal networks, the stationary density is proportional to the in-strength of the so-called effective network, a weighted and directed network explicitly constructed from the original sequence of transition matrices. The stationary density also depends on the sojourn probability q, which regulates the tendency of the walker to stay in the node, and on the temporal resolution of the data. We apply our method to human interaction networks and show that although it is important for a node to be connected to another node with many random walkers (one of the principles of the PageRank) at the right moment, this effect is negligible in practice when the time order of link activation is included.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available