4.7 Article

Soluble CD40L Is a Useful Marker to Predict Future Strokes in Patients With Minor Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack

Journal

STROKE
Volume 46, Issue 7, Pages 1990-1992

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.008685

Keywords

CD40 ligand; ischemic attack; transient; prognosis; stroke

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81200844, 81471211]
  2. Beijing Postdoctoral Working Funding [2014ZZ-10]
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China [2008ZX09312-008, 2012ZX09303, 200902004, 2011BAI08B02]
  4. Beijing Biobank of Cerebral Vascular Disease [D131100005313003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and Purpose Elevated soluble CD40 ligand (sCD40L) was shown to be related to cardiovascular events, but the role of sCD40L in predicting recurrent stroke remains unclear. Methods Baseline sCD40L levels were measured in 3044 consecutive patients with acute minor stroke and transient ischemic attack, who had previously been enrolled in the Clopidogrel in High-Risk Patients With Acute Nondisabling Cerebrovascular Events (CHANCE) trial. Cox proportional-hazards model was used to assess the association of sCD40L with recurrent stroke. Results Patients in the top tertile of sCD40L levels had increased risk of recurrent stroke comparing with those in the bottom tertile, after adjusted for conventional confounding factors (hazard ratio, 1.49; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-2.00; P=0.008). The patients with elevated levels of both sCD40L and high-sensitive C-reactive protein also had increased risk of recurrent stroke (hazard ratio, 1.81; 95% confidence interval, 1.23-2.68; P=0.003). Conclusions Elevated sCD40L levels independently predict recurrent stroke in patients with minor stroke and transient ischemic attack. Clinical Trial Registration URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00979589.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available