4.6 Article

Magnetism and domain formation in SU(3)-symmetric multi-species Fermi mixtures

Journal

NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS
Volume 13, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/13/3/035013

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. German Science Foundation DFG [Sonderforschungsbereich SFB-TRR 49]
  2. Austrian Science Fund [SFB F40 FOQUS, EUROQUAM DQS (I118-N16)]
  3. ARO [W911NF-08-1-0338]
  4. NSF-DMR [0706203]
  5. National Science Foundation [PHY05-51164]
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  7. Division Of Materials Research [0706203] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We study the phase diagram of an SU(3)-symmetric mixture of three-component ultracold fermions with attractive interactions in an optical lattice, including the additional effect on the mixture of an effective three-body constraint induced by three-body losses. We address the properties of the system in D >= 2 by using dynamical mean-field theory and variational Monte Carlo techniques. The phase diagram of the model shows a strong interplay between magnetism and superfluidity. In the absence of the three-body constraint (no losses), the system undergoes a phase transition from a color superfluid (c-SF) phase to a trionic phase, which shows additional particle density modulations at half-filling. Away from the particle-hole symmetric point the c-SF phase is always spontaneously magnetized, leading to the formation of different c-SF domains in systems where the total number of particles of each species is conserved. This can be seen as the SU(3) symmetric realization of a more general tendency for phase separation in three-component Fermi mixtures. The three-body constraint strongly disfavors the trionic phase, stabilizing a (fully magnetized) c-SF also at strong coupling. With increasing temperature we observe a transition to a non-magnetized SU(3) Fermi liquid phase.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available