4.6 Article

Preparation, crystal structures, thermal decompositions and explosive properties of two new high-nitrogen azide ethylenediamine energetic compounds

Journal

NEW JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages 646-653

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c2nj40887b

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Science and Technology on Applied Physical Chemistry Laboratory [9140C3703051105, 9140C370303120C37142]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology [QNKT12-02, ZDKT10-01b]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two new multi-ligand coordination compounds of copper(II) ethylenediamine (en) azide and cobalt(III) ethylenediamine azide, [Cu-2(en)(2)(N-3)(4)](n) (1) and Co(en)(2)(N-3)(2)(NO3) (2), were synthesized and characterized by elemental analysis and FT-IR spectroscopy. The crystal structures were determined by X-ray single crystal diffraction. The obtained results show that the crystals of 1 and 2 belong to the monoclinic, C2/c space group. The metal cations are six-coordinated with the azido ligands and ethylenediamine molecules through nitrogen atoms. The coordination modes of the azido-groups were mu-1, mu-1,1 and mu-1,1,3 modes for 1, and mu-1 mode for 2. Under a nitrogen atmosphere, with a heating rate of 5 K min(-1), the thermal decompositions contain two main exothermic stages in the DSC curves corresponding to the TG-DTG curves. The non-isothermal kinetics parameters were calculated by the Kissinger's method and Ozawa's method, respectively. The energies of combustion, enthalpies of formation, critical temperature of thermal explosion, entropies of activation (Delta S-not equal), enthalpies of activation (Delta H-not equal), and free energies of activation (Delta G(not equal)) were measured and calculated. The sensitivity properties were also determined with standard methods and the results showed that 1 had a much higher flame sensitivity and lower impact sensitivity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available