4.8 Article

Stenting and Medical Therapy for Atherosclerotic Renal-Artery Stenosis

Journal

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
Volume 370, Issue 1, Pages 13-22

Publisher

MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1310753

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health [U01HL071556, U01HL072734, U01HL072735, U01HL072736, U01HL072737]
  2. Abbott
  3. AstraZeneca
  4. Eli Lilly
  5. Medtronic
  6. Boston Scientific
  7. Biomet
  8. Janssen
  9. Medicines Company
  10. Novartis
  11. Amgen
  12. Sanofi Aventis
  13. VIVA Physicians
  14. Covidien
  15. Biotronik
  16. St. Jude
  17. CSI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundAtherosclerotic renal-artery stenosis is a common problem in the elderly. Despite two randomized trials that did not show a benefit of renal-artery stenting with respect to kidney function, the usefulness of stenting for the prevention of major adverse renal and cardiovascular events is uncertain. MethodsWe randomly assigned 947 participants who had atherosclerotic renal-artery stenosis and either systolic hypertension while taking two or more antihypertensive drugs or chronic kidney disease to medical therapy plus renal-artery stenting or medical therapy alone. Participants were followed for the occurrence of adverse cardiovascular and renal events (a composite end point of death from cardiovascular or renal causes, myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for congestive heart failure, progressive renal insufficiency, or the need for renal-replacement therapy). ResultsOver a median follow-up period of 43 months (interquartile range, 31 to 55), the rate of the primary composite end point did not differ significantly between participants who underwent stenting in addition to receiving medical therapy and those who received medical therapy alone (35.1% and 35.8%, respectively; hazard ratio with stenting, 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76 to 1.17; P=0.58). There were also no significant differences between the treatment groups in the rates of the individual components of the primary end point or in all-cause mortality. During follow-up, there was a consistent modest difference in systolic blood pressure favoring the stent group (-2.3 mm Hg; 95% CI, -4.4 to -0.2; P=0.03). ConclusionsRenal-artery stenting did not confer a significant benefit with respect to the prevention of clinical events when added to comprehensive, multifactorial medical therapy in people with atherosclerotic renal-artery stenosis and hypertension or chronic kidney disease. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00081731.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available