4.8 Article

Endovascular Therapy after Intravenous t-PA versus t-PA Alone for Stroke

Journal

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
Volume 368, Issue 10, Pages 893-903

Publisher

MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1214300

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health
  2. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [UC U01NS052220, MUSC U01NS054630, U01NS077304]
  3. Genentech
  4. EKOS
  5. Concentric Medical
  6. Cordis Neurovascular
  7. Boehringer Ingelheim
  8. Oakstone Publishing
  9. BrainsGate
  10. Edge Therapeutics
  11. Covidien
  12. Penumbra
  13. Janssen Pharmaceuticals
  14. Medical Dialogues
  15. Vernalis Group
  16. Hoffmann-La Roche Canada
  17. Servier Canada
  18. Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada
  19. Heart and Stroke Foundation of Alberta, Northwest Territories, and Nunavut
  20. Alberta Innovates-Health Solutions
  21. Silk Road Medical
  22. Boehringer Ingelheim Canada
  23. Lundbeck
  24. GE Healthcare
  25. Photo-Thera

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND Endovascular therapy is increasingly used after the administration of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) for patients with moderate-to-severe acute ischemic stroke, but whether a combined approach is more effective than intravenous t-PA alone is uncertain. METHODS We randomly assigned eligible patients who had received intravenous t-PA within 3 hours after symptom onset to receive additional endovascular therapy or intravenous t-PA alone, in a 2: 1 ratio. The primary outcome measure was a modified Rankin scale score of 2 or less (indicating functional independence) at 90 days (scores range from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater disability). RESULTS The study was stopped early because of futility after 656 participants had undergone randomization (434 patients to endovascular therapy and 222 to intravenous t-PA alone). The proportion of participants with a modified Rankin score of 2 or less at 90 days did not differ significantly according to treatment (40.8% with endovascular therapy and 38.7% with intravenous t-PA; absolute adjusted difference, 1.5 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -6.1 to 9.1, with adjustment for the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score [8-19, indicating moderately severe stroke, or >= 20, indicating severe stroke]), nor were there significant differences for the predefined subgroups of patients with an NIHSS score of 20 or higher (6.8 percentage points; 95% CI, -4.4 to 18.1) and those with a score of 19 or lower (-1.0 percentage point; 95% CI, -10.8 to 8.8). Findings in the endovascular-therapy and intravenous t-PA groups were similar for mortality at 90 days (19.1% and 21.6%, respectively; P = 0.52) and the proportion of patients with symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage within 30 hours after initiation of t-PA (6.2% and 5.9%, respectively; P = 0.83). CONCLUSIONS The trial showed similar safety outcomes and no significant difference in functional independence with endovascular therapy after intravenous t-PA, as compared with intravenous t-PA alone. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00359424.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available