4.8 Article

Aspirin for Preventing the Recurrence of Venous Thromboembolism

Journal

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
Volume 366, Issue 21, Pages 1959-1967

Publisher

MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1114238

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. University of Perugia
  2. Bayer HealthCare
  3. International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
  4. Boehringer Ingelheim
  5. Daiichi Sankyo
  6. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  7. Sanofi-Aventis
  8. Pfizer
  9. Bayer Schering Pharma
  10. GlaxoSmithKline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background About 20% of patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism have a recurrence within 2 years after the withdrawal of oral anticoagulant therapy. Extending anticoagulation prevents recurrences but is associated with increased bleeding. The benefit of aspirin for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism is unknown. Methods In this multicenter, investigator-initiated, double-blind study, patients with first-ever unprovoked venous thromboembolism who had completed 6 to 18 months of oral anticoagulant treatment were randomly assigned to aspirin, 100 mg daily, or placebo for 2 years, with the option of extending the study treatment. The primary efficacy outcome was recurrence of venous thromboembolism, and major bleeding was the primary safety outcome. Results Venous thromboembolism recurred in 28 of the 205 patients who received aspirin and in 43 of the 197 patients who received placebo (6.6% vs. 11.2% per year; hazard ratio, 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36 to 0.93) (median study period, 24.6 months). During a median treatment period of 23.9 months, 23 patients taking aspirin and 39 taking placebo had a recurrence (5.9% vs. 11.0% per year; hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.92). One patient in each treatment group had a major bleeding episode. Adverse events were similar in the two groups. Conclusions Aspirin reduced the risk of recurrence when given to patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism who had discontinued anticoagulant treatment, with no apparent increase in the risk of major bleeding.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available