4.8 Article

Rivaroxaban in Patients with a Recent Acute Coronary Syndrome

Journal

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
Volume 366, Issue 1, Pages 9-19

Publisher

MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1112277

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Johnson Johnson
  2. Bayer Healthcare
  3. AstraZeneca
  4. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  5. Merck
  6. Novartis
  7. Sanofi-Aventis
  8. Bristol-Myers Squibb/Sanofi-Aventis
  9. Daiichi Sankyo
  10. Eli Lilly
  11. Arena
  12. Bayer
  13. Ortho McNeil
  14. Merck Schering Plough
  15. Merck/Schering-Plough
  16. GlaxoSmithKline
  17. Iroko
  18. Eisai
  19. Ethicon
  20. Medtronic
  21. Medicines Company
  22. Boehringer Ingelheim
  23. Lilly
  24. Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer
  25. Otsuka
  26. Asteras
  27. Medtronics Japan
  28. Mochida
  29. Pfizer
  30. Takeda
  31. Tanabe Mitsubishi
  32. Amarin
  33. Regado Bioscience
  34. Bayer Pharmaceuticals
  35. Symetis
  36. Archemix
  37. Biogen IDEC
  38. Genentech
  39. Ischemix
  40. Medicure
  41. Portola Pharmaceuticals
  42. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21590911, 22136007, 21390244] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND Acute coronary syndromes arise from coronary atherosclerosis with superimposed thrombosis. Since factor Xa plays a central role in thrombosis, the inhibition of factor Xa with low-dose rivaroxaban might improve cardiovascular outcomes in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome. METHODS In this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned 15,526 patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome to receive twice-daily doses of either 2.5 mg or 5 mg of rivaroxaban or placebo for a mean of 13 months and up to 31 months. The primary efficacy end point was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke. RESULTS Rivaroxaban significantly reduced the primary efficacy end point, as compared with placebo, with respective rates of 8.9% and 10.7% (hazard ratio in the rivaroxaban group, 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74 to 0.96; P=0.008), with significant improvement for both the twice-daily 2.5-mg dose (9.1% vs. 10.7%, P=0.02) and the twice-daily 5-mg dose (8.8% vs. 10.7%, P=0.03). The twice-daily 2.5-mg dose of rivaroxaban reduced the rates of death from cardiovascular causes (2.7% vs. 4.1%, P=0.002) and from any cause (2.9% vs. 4.5%, P=0.002), a survival benefit that was not seen with the twice-daily 5-mg dose. As compared with placebo, rivaroxaban increased the rates of major bleeding not related to coronary-artery bypass grafting (2.1% vs. 0.6%, P<0.001) and intracranial hemorrhage (0.6% vs. 0.2%, P=0.009), without a significant increase in fatal bleeding (0.3% vs. 0.2%, P=0.66) or other adverse events. The twice-daily 2.5-mg dose resulted in fewer fatal bleeding events than the twice-daily 5-mg dose (0.1% vs. 0.4%, P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS In patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome, rivaroxaban reduced the risk of the composite end point of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Rivaroxaban increased the risk of major bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage but riot the risk of fatal bleeding. (Funded by Johnson & Johnson and Bayer Healthcare 7 ATLAS ACS 2-TIMI 51 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00809965.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available