4.8 Article

Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening

Journal

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
Volume 365, Issue 5, Pages 395-409

Publisher

MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1102873

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute
  2. National Lung Screening [NCT00047385]
  3. Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis [U01-CA-80098, U01-CA-79778]
  4. Early Detection Research Group and Biometry Research Group, Division of Cancer Prevention: University of Colorado Denver [N01-CN-25514]
  5. Georgetown University [N01-CN-25522]
  6. Pacific Health Research and Education Institute [N01-CN-25515]
  7. Henry Ford Health System [N01-CN-25512]
  8. University of Minnesota [N01-CN-25513]
  9. Washington University in St. Louis [N01-CN-25516]
  10. University of Pittsburgh [N01-CN-25511]
  11. University of Utah [N01-CN-25524]
  12. Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation [N01-CN-25518]
  13. University of Alabama at Birmingham [N01-CN-75022]
  14. Westat [N01-CN-25476]
  15. Information Management Services [N02-CN-63300]
  16. Wilex
  17. MELA Sciences
  18. Endocyte
  19. Bayer HealthCare
  20. Radiological Society of North America
  21. MRC [G0902006] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND The aggressive and heterogeneous nature of lung cancer has thwarted efforts to reduce mortality from this cancer through the use of screening. The advent of low-dose helical computed tomography (CT) altered the landscape of lung-cancer screening, with studies indicating that low-dose CT detects many tumors at early stages. The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) was conducted to determine whether screening with low-dose CT could reduce mortality from lung cancer. METHODS From August 2002 through April 2004, we enrolled 53,454 persons at high risk for lung cancer at 33 U. S. medical centers. Participants were randomly assigned to undergo three annual screenings with either low-dose CT (26,722 participants) or single-view posteroanterior chest radiography (26,732). Data were collected on cases of lung cancer and deaths from lung cancer that occurred through December 31, 2009. RESULTS The rate of adherence to screening was more than 90%. The rate of positive screening tests was 24.2% with low-dose CT and 6.9% with radiography over all three rounds. A total of 96.4% of the positive screening results in the low-dose CT group and 94.5% in the radiography group were false positive results. The incidence of lung cancer was 645 cases per 100,000 person-years (1060 cancers) in the low-dose CT group, as compared with 572 cases per 100,000 person-years (941 cancers) in the radiography group (rate ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03 to 1.23). There were 247 deaths from lung cancer per 100,000 person-years in the low-dose CT group and 309 deaths per 100,000 person-years in the radiography group, representing a relative reduction in mortality from lung cancer with low-dose CT screening of 20.0% (95% CI, 6.8 to 26.7; P = 0.004). The rate of death from any cause was reduced in the low-dose CT group, as compared with the radiography group, by 6.7% (95% CI, 1.2 to 13.6; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS Screening with the use of low-dose CT reduces mortality from lung cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available