4.8 Article

Pallidal versus Subthalamic Deep-Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease

Journal

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
Volume 362, Issue 22, Pages 2077-2091

Publisher

MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907083

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Research and Development
  2. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
  3. Medtronic
  4. Novartis
  5. Teva
  6. Schering-Plough
  7. Boehringer Ingelheim
  8. Vernalis
  9. Ipsen
  10. Ceregene
  11. Sofamor Danek
  12. Schering-Plough Research Institute
  13. Samueli Institute
  14. Ipsen Pharmaceuticals
  15. Teva Pharmaceuticals
  16. Boston Scientific
  17. SurgiVision

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND Deep-brain stimulation is the surgical procedure of choice for patients with advanced Parkinson's disease. The globus pallidus interna and the subthalamic nucleus are accepted targets for this procedure. We compared 24-month outcomes for patients who had undergone bilateral stimulation of the globus pallidus interna (pallidal stimulation) or subthalamic nucleus (subthalamic stimulation). METHODS At seven Veterans Affairs and six university hospitals, we randomly assigned 299 patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease to undergo either pallidal stimulation (152 patients) or subthalamic stimulation (147 patients). The primary outcome was the change in motor function, as blindly assessed on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, part III (UPDRS-III), while patients were receiving stimulation but not receiving antiparkinsonian medication. Secondary outcomes included self-reported function, quality of life, neurocognitive function, and adverse events. RESULTS Mean changes in the primary outcome did not differ significantly between the two study groups (P=0.50). There was also no significant difference in self-reported function. Patients undergoing subthalamic stimulation required a lower dose of dopaminergic agents than did those undergoing pallidal stimulation (P=0.02). One component of processing speed (visuomotor) declined more after subthalamic stimulation than after pallidal stimulation (P=0.03). The level of depression worsened after subthalamic stimulation and improved after pallidal stimulation (P=0.02). Serious adverse events occurred in 51% of patients undergoing pallidal stimulation and in 56% of those undergoing subthalamic stimulation, with no significant between-group differences at 24 months. CONCLUSIONS Patients with Parkinson's disease had similar improvement in motor function after either pallidal or subthalamic stimulation. Nonmotor factors may reasonably be included in the selection of surgical target for deep-brain stimulation. (ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00056563 and NCT01076452.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available