4.5 Review

Advances in Reprogramming-Based Study of Neurologic Disorders

Journal

STEM CELLS AND DEVELOPMENT
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages 1265-1283

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/scd.2015.0044

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute on Deafness and other Communication Disorders [DC012592]
  2. National Institute of Mental Health [MH102698]
  3. California Institute for Regenerative Medicine [RB3-02186, TG201165]
  4. Baxter Family Foundation
  5. Norris Foundation
  6. Del Webb Foundation
  7. Dorris Neuroscience Center

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The technology to convert adult human non-neural cells into neural lineages, through induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), somatic cell nuclear transfer, and direct lineage reprogramming or transdifferentiation has progressed tremendously in recent years. Reprogramming-based approaches aimed at manipulating cellular identity have enormous potential for disease modeling, high-throughput drug screening, cell therapy, and personalized medicine. Human iPSC (hiPSC)-based cellular disease models have provided proof of principle evidence of the validity of this system. However, several challenges remain before patient-specific neurons produced by reprogramming can provide reliable insights into disease mechanisms or be efficiently applied to drug discovery and transplantation therapy. This review will first discuss limitations of currently available reprogramming-based methods in faithfully and reproducibly recapitulating disease pathology. Specifically, we will address issues such as culture heterogeneity, interline and inter-individual variability, and limitations of two-dimensional differentiation paradigms. Second, we will assess recent progress and the future prospects of reprogramming-based neurologic disease modeling. This includes three-dimensional disease modeling, advances in reprogramming technology, prescreening of hiPSCs and creating isogenic disease models using gene editing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available