4.1 Review

Zebrafish models for assessing developmental and reproductive toxicity

Journal

NEUROTOXICOLOGY AND TERATOLOGY
Volume 42, Issue -, Pages 35-42

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ntt.2014.01.006

Keywords

Zebrash; Developmental toxicity; Embryo toxicity; Reproductive toxicity; Chemical toxicity

Funding

  1. National Innovation Fund of China [12C26213302918]
  2. National Torch Plan of China [2012GH020813]
  3. National Major Specific Project for Innovation of New Pharmaceuticals [2009ZX09103-649]
  4. Zhejiang Provincial Major Research Program [2008C14082, 2010C13007]
  5. Zhejiang Key Science and Technology Innovation Program for the Cultivation of High-level Innovative Health Talents
  6. Wenzhou Municipal Research Program [G20090142]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The zebrafish is increasingly used as a vertebrate animal model for in vivo drug discovery and for assessing chemical toxicity and safety. Numerous studies have confirmed that zebrafish and mammals are similar in their physiology, development, metabolism and pathways, and that zebrafish responses to toxic substances are highly predictive of mammalian responses. Developmental and reproductive toxicity assessments are an important part of new drug safety profiling. A significant number of drug candidates have failed in predinical tests due to their adverse effect on development andreproductivity. Compared to conventional mammal testing, zebrafish testing for assessing developmental and reproductive toxicity offers several compelling experimental advantages, including transparency of embryo and larva, higher throughput, shorter test period, lower cost, smaller amount of compound required, easier manipulation and direct compound delivery. Toxicity and safety assessments using zebrafish have also been accepted by the FDA and EMEA for investigative new drug (IND) approval. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available