4.1 Article

Roles of aquaporins and matrix metalloproteinases in mouse brain edema formation induced by subacute exposure to 1,2-dichloroethane

Journal

NEUROTOXICOLOGY AND TERATOLOGY
Volume 44, Issue -, Pages 105-112

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ntt.2014.06.005

Keywords

1,2-Dichloroethane; Brain edema; Aquaporins; Matrix metalloproteinases

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC 81172644]
  2. Program for Liaoning Excellent Talents in University [LR2013038]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to explore the effects of 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCE) on expression of aquaporins (AQPs) and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) in the process of brain edema formation. Two parts were included in this study, establishment of animal model of brain edema, and mechanism of brain edema induced by subacute exposure to 1,2-DCE. In part one, mice were exposed to 0, 1.1, 1.2 or 1.3 g/m(3) 1,2-DCE, 3.5 h per day for 3 days. Pathological analysis and water content detection in the brain were examined. In part two, mice were exposed to 12 g/m(3) 1,2-DCE, 3.5 h per day for 1, 2 or 3 days, named group D, E and F, respectively. Expression of AQP4, MMP2 and MMP9 in the brain was determined by immunochemical staining, western blot and real time PCR. According to the results of part one, the 12 g/m(3) dose was chosen for part two, a follow-up time-course study. In part two, protein expression of MMP2 and MMP9 in group F, and AQP4 in group E and F significantly increased compared to the control. Similarly, mRNA levels of AQP4 in group F, and MMP9 in group E and F significantly increased. Our results suggested that exposure to 1,2-DCE might up-regulate the expression of AQP4 protein and MMP9 mRNA at the early phase of brain edema, and AQP4 may play an important role in the brain edema formation. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available