4.4 Article

In utero and lactational exposure to low doses of chlorinated and brominated dioxins induces deficits in the fear memory of male mice

Journal

NEUROTOXICOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages 385-390

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuro.2010.04.004

Keywords

2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin; 2,3,7,8-tetrabromodibenzo-p-dioxin; In utero and lactational exposure; Fear conditioning; Mice

Funding

  1. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan
  2. Environmental Technology Development Fund
  3. Food Safety Commission
  4. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22681008] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Environmental-level in utero and lactational exposures to dioxins have been considered to affect brain functions of offspring. Here, we determined whether in utero and lactational exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and 2,3,7,8-tetrabromodibenzo-p-dioxin (TBDD), at the dose that does not harm the dams, affects the acquisition and retention of fear memory in mouse offspring. Pregnant C57BL/6J mice were administered by gavages TCDD or TBDD at a dose of 0 or 3.0 mu g/kg body weight on gestation day 12.5, and their male offspring were examined for their behavior in adulthood. In the fear conditioning, a paired presentation of tone and foot shock was repeated three times, and retention tests for contextual and auditory fear memory were carried out 1 and 24 h after the fear conditioning. Groups of mice that were exposed to TCDD and TBDD in utero and via lactation showed deficits in the contextual and auditory retention tests at 1 and 24 h retention intervals. The present results suggest that maternal exposure to a low dose of TCDD or TBDD disrupts the functions of memory and emotion in male mouse offspring, and that the developmental toxicities of these chemicals are similar to each other. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available