4.4 Article

Sex-Specific Response of Caenorhabditis elegans to Methylmercury Toxicity

Journal

NEUROTOXICITY RESEARCH
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages 208-216

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12640-018-9949-4

Keywords

Methylmercury; Sex; Male; C; elegans; Antioxidant; Thioredoxin

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [NIEHS R01ES07331, R01ES10563]
  2. German Research Foundation (DFG) [BO 4103/2-1]
  3. DFG Research Unit TraceAge [FOR 2558]
  4. NCI Cancer Grant [P30CA013330]
  5. NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Methylmercury (MeHg), an abundant environmental pollutant, has long been known to adversely affect neurodevelopment in both animals and humans. Several reports from epidemiological studies, as well as experimental data indicate sex-specific susceptibility to this neurotoxicant; however, the molecular bases of this process are still not clear. In the present study, we used Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans), to investigate sex differences in response to MeHg toxicity during development. Worms at different developmental stage (L1, L4, and adult) were treated with MeHg for 1h. Lethality assays revealed that male worms exhibited significantly higher resistance to MeHg than hermaphrodites, when at L4 stage or adults. However, the number of worms with degenerated neurons was unaffected by MeHg, both in males and hermaphrodites. Lower susceptibility of males was not related to changes in mercury (Hg) accumulation, which was analogous for both wild-type (wt) and male-rich him-8 strain. Total glutathione (GSH) levels decreased upon MeHg in him-8, but not in wt. Moreover, the sex-dependent response of the cytoplasmic thioredoxin system was observedmales exhibited significantly higher expression of thioredoxin TRX-1, and thioredoxin reductase TRXR-1 expression was downregulated upon MeHg treatment only in hermaphrodites. These outcomes indicate that the redox status is an important contributor to sex-specific sensitivity to MeHg in C. elegans.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available