Journal
NEUROSURGERY
Volume 68, Issue 5, Pages 1209-1218Publisher
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31820b526a
Keywords
Singular brain metastases; Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS); Stereotactic (125)iodine brachytherapy (SBT)
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
BACKGROUND: Brain metastases represent the most common intracranial tumors and are associated with very poor prognosis. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility, survival, and cerebral disease control of patients with singular brain metastases treated with stereotactic (125)iodine brachytherapy (SBT), to identify prognostic factors, and to compare results with other local treatment methods. METHODS: Complications, survival (overall and separated by recursive partitioning analysis [RPA] classes), and local and distant disease control were evaluated retrospectively in 90 patients. Prognostic factors were identified by forming subgroups of patients based on age, Karnofsky Performance Status, status of extracranial disease, interval since initial diagnosis, absence/presence of prior whole-brain radiation therapy, localization, morphology, and tumor volume. RESULTS: There was no treatment-related mortality, and morbidity was transient and low (3.3%). Median survival was 8.5 months overall and 18.1 months for RPA class 1 patients. After 1 year, the actuarial incidence of local and distant cerebral relapse was 5.4% and 46.4%, respectively. Karnofsky Performance Status >= 70 (P < .002), stable systemic disease (P < .02), RPA class 1 (P < .02), and a prolonged (> 12 month) interval between initial diagnosis and SBT (P < .05) significantly improved survival. No significant influence of previous whole-brain radiation therapy on survival or cerebral disease relapse was found. CONCLUSION: SBT represents a safe, minimally invasive, and, compared with SRS and microsurgery, a similarly effective local treatment option in terms of survival and cerebral disease control. It allows histological (re-)evaluation and treatment within 1 stereotactic operation. Because it is less restricted by tumor localization or size, it greatly advances local treatment options, and on the basis of its favorable biological irradiation effect, SBT does not limit additional irradiation treatment in the event of disease relapse.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available