3.9 Article

Targeted Deletion of CASK-Interacting Nucleosome Assembly Protein Causes Higher Locomotor and Exploratory Activities

Journal

NEUROSIGNALS
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages 128-141

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000327819

Keywords

Cognitive impairment; Exploration; Locomotion; N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor subunit 2b; Nucleosome assembly protein

Funding

  1. Academia Sinica
  2. National Health Research Institute [NHRI-EX98-9403NI]
  3. National Science Council [NSC 99-2321-B-001-032]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

CASK-interacting nucleosome assembly protein (CINAP) has been shown to interact with the calcium/calmodulin-dependent serine kinase (CASK) and the T-box transcription factor T-brain-1 (Tbr1) thus modulating the expression of N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor subunit 2b (NMDAR2b) in cultured hippocampal neurons. To explore the physiological significance of CINAP in vivo, CINAP knockout mice were generated and subjected to biochemical, anatomical, and behavioral analyses. Unexpectedly, CINAP deletion did not impact NMDAR2b expression, and these CINAP knockout mice were consistently comparable to wild-type littermates in terms of immediate memory (assessed with the Y maze) and associative memory (evaluated by conditioned taste aversion and contextual and auditory fear conditioning). Although CINAP deletion did not obviously influence learning and memory behaviors, CINAP knockout mice exhibited higher locomotor and exploratory activities. Compared with wild-type littermates, the horizontal and vertical movements of the CINAP knockout mice were higher in a novel environment; in home cages, rearing, sniffing, and jumping also occurred more frequently in CINAP knockout mice. These observations suggest that although CINAP deletion in mice does not influence learning and memory behaviors, CINAP is required for restriction of locomotor and exploratory activities. Copyright (C) 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available