4.3 Article

Right frontopolar cortex activity correlates with reliability of retrospective rating of confidence in short-term recognition memory performance

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH
Volume 68, Issue 3, Pages 199-206

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neures.2010.07.2041

Keywords

fMRI; Working memory; Recognition; Memory monitoring; Metamemory; Frontopolar cortex

Categories

Funding

  1. Japan Science and Technology Agency
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Human memory systems contain self-monitoring mechanisms for evaluating their progress. People can change their learning strategy on the basis of confidence in their performance at that time. However, it has not been fully understood how the brain is engaged in reliable rating of confidence in past recognition memory performance. We measured the brain activity by fMRI while healthy subjects performed a visual short-term recognition memory test and then rated their confidence in their answers as high, middle, or low. As shown previously, their behavioral performance in the confidence rating widely varied; some showed a positive confidence-recognition correlation (i.e., rate reliably) while others did not. Among brain regions showing greater activity during rating their confidence relative to during a control, non-metamemory task (discriminating brightness of words), only a posterior-dorsal part of the right frontopolar cortex exhibited higher activity as the confidence level better correlated with actual recognition memory performance. These results suggest that activation in the right frontopolar cortex is key to a reliable, retrospective rating of confidence in short-term recognition memory performance. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd and the Japan Neuroscience Society. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available