4.3 Article

Mild hypobaric hypoxia preconditioning up-regulates expression of transcription factors c-Fos and NGFI-A in rat neocortex and hippocampus

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH
Volume 65, Issue 4, Pages 360-366

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neures.2009.08.013

Keywords

Brain; Hypoxia; Preconditioning; Hypoxic tolerance; c-Fos; NGFI-A

Categories

Funding

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR) [07-04-00664]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Transcription factors c-Fos and NGFI-A encoded by immediate early genes largely participate in the biochemical cascade leading to genomically driven lasting adaptation by neurons to injurious exposures including hypoxia/ischemia. Present study was designed to examine the involvement of c-Fos and NGFI-A in the development of brain hypoxic tolerance induced by mild hypoxic preconditioning. Earlier we have reported that preconditioning by repetitive mild hypobaric hypoxia (MHH) considerably increases neuronal resistance to subsequent severe injurious exposures. Herein, changes of c-Fos and NGFI-A expression in vulnerable rat brain areas (hippocampus, neocortex) in response to preconditioning MHH itself were studied using quantitative immunocytochemistry. Exposure to MHH differentially enhanced c-Fos and NGFI-A expression in neocortex and hippocampal fields 3-24 h following the last MHH trial. The c-Fos up-regulation was the most pronounced in neocortex. CA1, and dentate gyrus, but it was twice lower in CA3/CA4. The up-regulation of NGFI-A in CA1, dentate gyrus and neocortex was 1.5-2-fold lower than that of c-Fos; but in CA3 and CA4 the rates of the c-Fos and NGFI-A induction were comparable. The present findings indicate that cooperative but differential activation of c-Fos and NGFI-A expression in vulnerable brain areas contribute to the development of tolerance achieved by MHH preconditioning. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd and the Japan Neuroscience Society. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available