4.3 Article

Differential astroglial activation in 6-hydroxydopamine models of Parkinson's disease

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH
Volume 62, Issue 4, Pages 246-253

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neures.2008.09.001

Keywords

Astrocyte; Glial fibrillary acidic protein; Basal ganglia; Gliosis; Glial communication; Astrocytic activation

Categories

Funding

  1. Federal Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF) [01 ZZ 0108]
  2. Mecklenburg/Western Pomerania

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In rat models of Parkinson's disease, injections of 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) into different areas of the basal ganglia result in dopaminergic neurodegeneration in the substantia nigra. The extent and time course of the dopaminergic lesions varies between the models. While the effects on neurons have been extensively studied, little is known about the effects on astrocytes. We compared astrocytic activation (i.e. increase in number and staining intensity of glial fibrillary acidic protein immunoreactive cells) at the injection site and in downstream structures of the motor loop, i.e. the globus pallidus (GP) and the subthalamic nucleus (STN) following 6-OHDA lesion of the medial forebrain bundle (MFB) or the striatum. Lesions in both regions resulted in astrocytic activation at the lesion site, but their remote effects varied. MFB injections caused astrocytic activation in the ipsi- and contralateral striatum, whereas striatal injections resulted in astrocytic activation in the GP and STN. Since 6-OHDA injections into the MFB and the striatum result in complete and partial SNc lesions, respectively, we hypothesize that communication links exist between astrocytes, or between neurons and astrocytes, along neuronal pathways that transmit activating signals in response to neuronal damage-but only if the neuronal pathways are at least partially intact. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd and the Japan Neuroscience Society. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available