4.3 Review

The application of starch-based ingredients in flavor encapsulation

Journal

STARCH-STARKE
Volume 67, Issue 3-4, Pages 225-236

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/star.201400163

Keywords

Cyclodextrin; Flavor encapsulation; Maltodextrin; Octenyl succinic anhydride (OSA) starch; Porous starch

Funding

  1. China State 12th Five-Year Plan scientific and technological support schemes [2012BAK17B06, 2012BAD31B01]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31371814, 31171721]
  3. 948 project of the Ministry of Agriculture of China [2011-G8-4]
  4. Shaanxi SheFa research projects [2011K17-05-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Flavors are of great importance in consumer satisfaction and affect further consumptions of food products. The preservation of aromatic additives is often a top concern of food manufacturers because aromatics are usually expensive, volatile, delicate and hard to handle. Encapsulation provides an effective approach to protect flavors against evaporation and undesirable reactions during storage by coating them with protective carrier materials. Starch has been considered as an excellent wall material for flavor encapsulation over the years. There has been an increasing demand for starches in flavor encapsulation attributed to their significant benefits, as they are fully biodegradable, widely available, inexpensive, and can be easily modified into derivatives with various properties. This paper intends to give a clear overview of the application of four commonly used starch-based ingredients, i.e., cyclodextrins, hydrolyzed starches, octenyl succinic anhydride starches and porous starches in flavor encapsulation. This review allows a better understanding of the properties of these starch derivatives, as well as their functions and problems in application of food flavor encapsulation. Future perspectives of starch application in flavor encapsulation are suggested.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available