4.4 Article

Resveratrol induced neuroprotection is mediated via both estrogen receptor subtypes, ERα, and ERβ

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
Volume 548, Issue -, Pages 217-221

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2013.05.057

Keywords

Ischemia; Reperfusion; Phytoestrogen; MPP; PHTPP

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Resveratrol, a dietary polyphenol with antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity, has been shown to provide neuroprotection in models of ischemia. However, the mechanism of action of resveratrol-induced neuroprotection remains unclear. Previous work in our laboratory has provided evidence that acute, systemic administration of resveratrol is neuroprotective in a permanent model of cerebral ischemia, an effect that was blocked when animals received the non-selective estrogen receptor antagonist, ICI, 182,780. The present study was designed to investigate whether the source of neuroprotection afforded by resveratrol action within the cerebral cortex itself is mediated preferentially via selective activation of either alpha or beta estrogen receptor subtype. Intracortical injection of resveratrol (0.1 and 1.0 mu M) 10 min prior to 30 min of ischemia followed by 5.5 h of reperfusion significantly reduced infarct volume in the prefrontal cortex. This neuroprotective effect was significantly attenuated when resveratrol injection (1.0 mu M) was preceded by injection of a selective estrogen receptor alpha antagonist, 1,3-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4-methyl-5-[4-(2-piperidinylethoxy)phenol]-1N-pyrozole dihydrochloride (MPP) or a selective estrogen receptor beta (ER beta) antagonist, 4-[2-phenyo-5,7-bis(trifluoromrthyl)pyrazolo(1,5-a)pyrimidin-3-yl]phenol (PHTPP). These results provide evidence for rapidly induced neuroprotection mediated by resveratrol activation of either estrogen receptor subtype within the ischemic cortex of rats. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available