4.4 Article

Tear levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha in patients with Parkinson's disease

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
Volume 553, Issue -, Pages 63-67

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2013.08.019

Keywords

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha; Neuroinflammation; Parkinson's disease; Tear

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Neuroinflammatory events mediated by the pro-inflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) cause progressive neurodegeneration in dopaminergic neurons, and play an important role in the pathogenesis of Parkinson's disease (PD). The purpose of this study was to determine TNF-alpha levels in tear samples obtained from patients with PD and to analyze the relationship between TNF-alpha values and PD characteristics. Eighteen patients with PD and 17 healthy control subjects were included in the study. We examined the patient demographics, modified Hoehn and Yahr Staging Scale (mHY) stages, Unified Parkinson's disease rating scale (UPDRS) II and III scores, Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores, and the predominant symptoms. We measured TNF-alpha using the multiplex immunobead assay in unstimulated tear samples, and determined the Schirmer's test and blink rate for each subject. Tear TNF-alpha values were significantly higher in patients with PD (196.9 +/- 121.2 pg/ml) than in control subjects (110.7 +/- 87.2 pg/ml; p = 0.02). We identified no relationship between tear TNF-alpha levels and age, sex, age at onset, PD duration, mHY stages, UPDRS II, UPDRS III, or MMSE scores. The higher TNF-alpha levels observed in the tears of patients with PD suggests neuroinflammation and TNF-alpha plays a role in the pathogenesis of PD. Tear TNF-alpha levels, however, were not related to the duration or severity of PD. Tears are a suitable method for measuring TNF-alpha levels, and can be used as a diagnostic measure to evaluate biomarkers in PD. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available