4.4 Article

Acidic preconditioning protects against ischemia-induced brain injury

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
Volume 523, Issue 1, Pages 3-8

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.05.015

Keywords

Cerebral ischemia; Preconditioning; Acidic preconditioning; Apoptosis

Categories

Funding

  1. National Basic Research of China 973 Program [2011CB504403]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81030061, 81173040, 81102427, 81102429]
  3. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [Y2110322]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ischemic preconditioning protects against cerebral ischemia. Recent investigations indicated that acidic preconditioning (APC) protects against ischemia-induced cardiomyocytes injury. However, it is not clear whether APC can protect against cerebral ischemia. To address this issue. C57BL/6 mice were exposed 3 times at 10-min intervals to a normoxic atmosphere containing 20% CO2 for 5 min before being further subjected to bilateral common carotid artery occlusion. APC reversed the ischemia-induced brain injury as revealed by improved performance in passive avoidance experiments and decreased neuron loss in the hippocampal CA1 region. Consistently, both APC-treated brain slices and primary cultured neurons were more resistant to oxygen-glucose-deprivation (OGD)-induced injury, in a pH- and time-dependent manner, as revealed by reversed cell/tissue viability. In addition, the APC treatment prevented OGD-induced mitochondrial transmembrane potential loss and apoptosis, which was inhibited by the mitochondrial permeability transport pore opener atractyloside. Taken together, these findings indicated that APC protects against ischemia-induced neuronal injury. The beneficial effects may be attributed, at least in part, to decreased mitochondria-dependent neuronal apoptosis. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available