4.4 Article

Gamma-irradiation is more efficient at depleting hippocampal neurogenesis than D-galactose/NaNO2

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
Volume 498, Issue 1, Pages 47-51

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.04.059

Keywords

Radiation; D-Galactose; Hippocampal neurogenesis; Doublecortin; Ki-67

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, South Korea [2010-0005282]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study was performed to compare the fractionated irradiation with the chronic D-galactose/NaNO2 administration as models for hippocampal neurogenesis suppression. Eight-week-old C57BL/6 mice were exposed to gamma-rays at 0.5 Gy semiweekly for 10 weeks or injected with D-galactose/NaNO2 mixture (1250 mg/kg of D-galactose and 90 mg/kg of NaNO2, i.p) 5 times per week for 10 weeks. To evaluate the suppression of hippocampal neurogenesis, we examined the numbers of the doublecortin (DCX; an immature progenitor cell marker) and Ki-67 (a proliferating cell marker) expressing cells by immunohistochemistry in the dentate gyrus (DG) region of the hippocampus in each treated group in comparison with those of age-matched control and 24-month-old mice as the positive control. The number of DCX-positive cells in the DG area was significantly decreased in both the irradiation and D-galactose/NaNO2 groups (96% and 50%) compared with the control. Also Ki-67-positive cells were significantly decreased in both groups (91% and 41%) compared with the control. Especially, both DCX and Ki-67-positive cells of irradiation group was much more significantly changed than those of the D-galactose/NaNO2 group. The positive control group of 24-momth-old mice showed dramatic decreases as similar irradiation group in DCX (99%) and Ki-67 (98%) - positive cells compared to the control group. In conclusion, this fractionated irradiation was a more effective method for depleting hippocampal neurogenesis than chronic D-galactose/NaNO2 exposure. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available