4.4 Article

Effects of PACAP on the oxidative stress-induced cell death in chicken pinealocytes is influenced by the phase of the circadian clock

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
Volume 484, Issue 2, Pages 148-152

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.08.039

Keywords

PACAP; Pineal cell culture; Oxidative stress; Chicken

Categories

Funding

  1. Hungarian Science Research Fund (OTKA) [K72592, F67830, CNK 78480]
  2. University of Pecs
  3. Bolyai Scholarship
  4. [ETT278-04/2009]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide (PACAP) is a neuropeptide with highly potent neuro- and general cytoprotective actions. PACAP is also an important modulator of circadian rhythmic functions, including time-dependent effects in the pineal gland. It is not known whether PACAP influences the survival of pinealocytes. The present study had two aims. First, we tested whether the cytoprotective effects of PACAP are present also in the pineal cells. As the pineal gland is the main circadian master clock in birds, we also tested whether this effect depends on the time of day. Using flow cytometry, we detected a significant decrease of cell viability after hydrogen peroxide-induced oxidative stress in chicken pinealocytes. PACAP alone did not influence cell survival. Co-incubation with PACAP in the dark phase (9 pm) was able to attenuate the toxic effect of H2O2. The survival-promoting effect could be counteracted by simultaneously applied PACAP antagonist, PACAP6-38. However, co-treatment with PACAP during the light phase (9 am) did not result in significant differences in the percentage of living cells. In summary, our results show that PACAP has a protective effect against the oxidative stress-induced cell death in chicken pinealocytes, but this effect is dependent on the phase of the circadian biological clock. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available