4.4 Article

Close association of p38 and JNK with plasminogen-dependent upregulation of PAI-1 in rat astrocytes in vitro

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
Volume 471, Issue 2, Pages 66-69

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.01.007

Keywords

Astrocytes; Plasminogen; Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1); Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)

Categories

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As reported previously, stimulation of astrocytes with plasminogen (PLGn) remarkably enhances their production/release of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1). In addition, both p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38MAPK) and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) are activated in these astrocytes. However, it remains to be determined whether the MAPK activation is associated with the PAI-1 induction in PLGn-stimulated astrocytes. In the present study, we investigated the relationship between MAPK activity and PAI-1 induction in PLGn-stimulated astrocytes. PLGn stimulation led to definitive phosphorylation of three MAPKs: external signal regulated kinase (ERK), JNK and p38. These results suggest that all of these MAPKs, either alone or in combination, are involved in PAI-1 induction. To verify this association, an inhibition experiment was carried out by using inhibitors specific for each MAPK. The results of the immunoblotting analysis indicated that 20 mu M SB203580 (the p38 inhibitor) or SP600125 (the JNK inhibitor) suppressed approximately 85% or 40% of PLGn-inducible PAI-1, respectively. Only 20% inhibition was achieved by pretreatment of astrocytes with 20 mu M PD98059 (the inhibitor of MEK1/2, an upstream kinase of ERK). In conclusion, p38 and JNK were shown to be the major MAPKs involved in the signaling cascade leading to PAI-1 induction in astrocytes stimulated with PLGn. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available