4.4 Article

Correct and erroneous picture naming responses in healthy subjects

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
Volume 463, Issue 3, Pages 167-171

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.07.077

Keywords

fMRI; Speech production; Picture naming; Speech error; Error processing; Self-monitoring

Categories

Funding

  1. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this functional magnetic resonance imaging study, brain activations of correct and erroneous picture naming responses were investigated in 34 healthy subjects using an event-related design. We regarded main effects comprising all (ALL), false (FAL), or correct (COR) responses only. Despite the rare error occurrence, activation maxima differed between all three main effects. To investigate the influence of naming accuracy on brain activations, we therefore (1) considered the number of errors as covariates, and (2) compared carefully matched sets of FAL and COR for subjects with higher error rates. As a result, activations in left middle/medial frontal gyrus were significantly correlated with number of errors. The neural substrate of naming errors appears to be separated in several subsystems of activation: first bilateral activations in anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), prefrontal, and premotor regions associated with monitoring processes; second the involvement of right (para)hippocampal gyrus most likely indicating post-error processes of retention; third perisylvian (especially inferior frontal) language areas. These activations were not restricted to false responses, but were with less intensity also recruited for correct responses. In contrast, there was no specific activation for successful name retrieval in correct trials. To conclude, the underlying processing mechanisms of erroneous and correct naming responses are strikingly similar; self-monitoring appears to be a general mechanism of the naming process. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available