4.4 Article

Neuroprotection against staurosporine by metalloporphyrins independent of antioxidant capability

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
Volume 466, Issue 1, Pages 41-46

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.09.028

Keywords

Metalloporphyrin; Staurosporine; Catalytic antioxidant; Cultured neurons

Categories

Funding

  1. Heart & Stroke Foundation of Ontario
  2. Canadian Stroke Network

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Metalloporphyrin catalytic antioxidants are remarkably useful in protecting cells and tissues in a wide array of disease models, attributed primarily to functioning as superoxide dismutase (SOD) mimetics or by scavenging other reactive oxygen species (ROS). However, we recently showed that neuroprotection against Ca(2+)-dependent excitotoxic insults did not correlate with antioxidant strength or capability [25], raising the question of whether scavenging of ROS underlies neuroprotection in other types of neuronal injury. The protein kinase inhibitor staurosporine causes neuronal demise primarily by apoptosis. Neuroprotection from staurosporine by a limited number of metalloporphyrin antioxidants has previously been attributed to antioxidant action. In the current study, a wide array of anionic and cationic metalloporphyrins and porphyrins, ranging in antioxidant strength or capability, provided protection against staurosporine in cortical neuron and cerebellar granule neuron (CGN) culture. Neuroprotection did not correlate with antioxidant strength or capability. In CGN but not cortical neuron cultures, NMDA receptor antagonists also prevented neurotoxicity, so metalloporphyrins may also target this secondary mode of death induced by staurosporine. Neuroprotection observed with antioxidant-inactive controls raises the possibility of an additional, or perhaps alternative, mechanism by antioxidant analogs not involving ROS scavenging. Crown Copyright (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available