4.4 Article

Effects of fluoxetine on the rat brain in the forced swimming test: A [F-18]FDG micro-PET imaging study

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
Volume 451, Issue 1, Pages 60-64

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.12.024

Keywords

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor; [F-18]FDG micro-PET; Forced swimming test; Hippocampus

Categories

Funding

  1. Bio-technology Development Program [M10862020005-08N6202-00510]
  2. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, the Republic of Korea [R01-2007-000-20782-0]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We used the [F-18]FDG micro-PET neuroimaging to examine the effects of fluoxetine on brain activity in rats and on their behavioral response in the forced swimming test (FST). In the first experiment, the rats were administered doses of fluoxetine (10 or 20 mg/kg) 24,19 and I h before the rat brains were scanned. Fluoxetine induced strong activation of the dorsal hippocampus and the deactivation of the inferior colliculus, medulla oblongata, and prelimbic cortex in a dose-dependent manner. These results seemed to be related with the changes in 5-HT (5-hydroxytryptamine, serotonin) levels after selective serotonin reuptake-inhibitor treatments. In the second experiment, the changes in glucose metabolism in the test session were measured after fluoxetine was given between pre-test and test sessions of the FST. Fluoxetine administration significantly decreased immobility behavior compared with saline administration. At the same time, the activity of the insular/piriform cortex decreased significantly. In contrast, the extent of cerebellar activation increased. The glucose metabolism of the dorsal hippocampus also increased, which suggests that post-stress changes in the facilitation of hippocampal serotonergic neurotransmission lead to decreased immobilization in the FST. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available