4.4 Article

Dendritic branching features of Golgi-impregnated neurons from the ventral medial amygdala subnuclei of adult male and female rats

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
Volume 439, Issue 3, Pages 287-292

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.05.025

Keywords

dendrites; sex difference; amygdaloid complex; anterodorsal medial amygdala; posteroventral medial amygdala

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The anterodorsal (MeAD) and posteroventral (MePV) subnuclei would form the proposed ventral division of the rat medial nucleus of the amygdala (MeA). These parts receive chemosensorial inputs, have gonadal hormone receptors and modulate hypothalamic neuroendocrine secretion and defensive/reproductive behaviors. The aims of this study were: (1) to provide further data on the morphology of Golgi-impregnated dendrites from the MeAD and the MePV of adult rats; and (2) to compare the results obtained for dendritic branching and predominant dendritic spatial distribution in both these subnuclei in males and diestrus females. Dendritic arborization levels, number of branches in each level, distribution of dendrites around the cell body and distally from it, and the preferred spatial distribution of dendritic branches were studied using different techniques and compared between sexes. WAD and MePV multipolar neurons had spiny dendrites with sparse ramifications. The main statistically significant differences were found in the predominant dendritic spatial distribution in the MeAD (rather medially and laterally in males and ventromedially in females, p < 0.02) and in the MePV (rather medially and mediodorsally in males and ventrally in females, p < 0.01). Results suggest that synaptic information might be processed and integrated differently in the dendrites of males and females in these sex steroid-responsive MeA subnuclei. The inclusion of the MeAD and the MePV in one single ventral MeA division is further discussed. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available