4.4 Article

Bilateral vagotomy differentially alters the magnitude of hypoglossal and phrenic long-term facilitation in anesthetized mechanically ventilated rats

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
Volume 442, Issue 3, Pages 213-218

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.07.034

Keywords

phrenic; hypoglossal; plasticity; breathing; hypoxia; vagus

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Acute intermittent hypoxia elicits long-term increases in respiratory motor output (long-term facilitation, LTF). Most investigators study LTF in mechanically ventilated, bilaterally vagotomized, and anesthetized animals. Vagotomy blocks inhibitory lung-volume feedback that could diminish the magnitude of LTF. However, the effects of vagotomy on LTF may not be so straight forward. In cats, vagotomy increases LTF of upper airway muscles but may decrease LTF of accessory pump muscles. The effects of vagotomy on LTF in rats are unknown. We hypothesized that the magnitude of hypoglossal and phrenic LTF would be differentially regulated by vagal afferent feedback in anesthetized and mechanically ventilated rats. Hypoglossal and phrenic motor outputs were recorded from vagotomized and vagally intact anesthetized mechanically ventilated adult Sprague-Dawley rats before during Ad up to 60-min after intermittent hypoxia. Ventilator frequency (f), pump volume, and peak tracheal pressure were not different between groups. The effects of vagotomy on the magnitude of LTF depended on the motoneuron population in question. The magnitude of hypoglossal LTF increased after vagotomy (vagi intact, -5 +/- 10%: vagotomy, 66 +/- 11% above baseline; p < 0.05); whereas, the magnitude of phrenic LTF decreased after vagotomy (vagi intact, 135 +/- 24%; vagotomy, 40 +/- 13% above baseline; p < 0.05). These data support previous work in anesthetized cats, and suggest that the expression of hypoglossal and phrenic respiratory motor plasticity is differentially regulated by vagal afferent feedback. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available