4.7 Review

Neural correlates of action: Comparing meta-analyses of imagery, observation, and execution

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS
Volume 94, Issue -, Pages 31-44

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.08.003

Keywords

Motor imagery; Action observation; Movement execution; Action simulation; Motor simulation; Mental imagery; Action observation system; Mirror neurons movement control; Motor control

Funding

  1. Marie Sklodowska-Curie Individual Fellowship NEURO-AGE [702784]
  2. Initiative and Networking Fund of the Helmholtz Association
  3. National Institute of Mental Health [R01-MH074457]
  4. Helmholtz Portfolio Theme Supercomputing and Modeling for the Human Brain
  5. European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme [7202070]
  6. KU Leuven Special Research Fund [C16/15/070]
  7. Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) [G0708.14]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Several models propose Motor Imagery, Action Observation, and Movement Execution recruit the same brain regions. There is, however, no quantitative synthesis of the literature that directly compares their respective networks. Here we summarized data from neuroimaging experiments examining Motor Imagery (303 experiments, 4902 participants), Action Observation (595 experiments, 11,032 participants), and related control tasks involving Movement Execution (142 experiments, 2302 participants). Comparisons across these networks showed that Motor Imagery and Action Observation recruited similar premotor-parietal cortical networks. However, while Motor Imagery recruited a similar subcortical network to Movement Execution, Action Observation did not consistently recruit any subcortical areas. These data quantify and amend previous models of the similarities in the networks for Motor Imagery, Action Observation, and Movement Execution, while highlighting key differences in their recruitment of motor cortex, parietal cortex, and subcortical structures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available