4.7 Review

The biological and psychological basis of neuroticism: Current status and future directions

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS
Volume 37, Issue 1, Pages 59-72

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.09.004

Keywords

Neuroticism; Psychopathology; Etiology; Mental disorder; Vulnerability; Negative affectivity; Reactivity; ANS; HPA axis; Neuroimaging; Cognitive bias; Coping

Funding

  1. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research NWO (Medical Research Council program) [GB-MW 940-38-011]
  2. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research NWO (ZonMW Brainpower grant) [100-001-004]
  3. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research NWO (NWO investment grant) [175.010.2003.005]
  4. European Science Foundation (EuroSTRESS project) [FP-006]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Neuroticism (N) is believed to reflect a stable disposition involving specific biological and psychological mechanisms that produce its robust association with psychopathology. The nature of these mechanisms remains unclear, however. Based on an extensive review of published evidence, we argue that three interesting leads are emerging. First, N may reflect individual differences in brain circuits involved in perception of and cognitive control over negative stimuli. More specifically, reduced connectivity between the left amygdala and ACC may impair extinction of the amygdala response to anxiety-eliciting stimuli. Second, the neural evidence matches the psychological findings, which associate N with a negative bias in attention, interpretation and recall of information, increased reactivity, and ineffective coping, and is consistent with findings of decreased cardiovascular flexibility. Third, current studies suggest that HPA-axis influences mood independently of N. Strong claims on N's biological basis, however, are not yet justified due to inconsistencies and lack of replication which are in part due to methodological limitations and N's heterogeneity. We discuss potential methodological improvements and substantive directions for future research. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available